O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health LawO’Neill Institute for National and Global Health LawLegal Issues in Health Reform

— This site is no longer active and is for archival purposes only. —

Tag Archives: exchange

Abortion in the Senate Bill

In a document titled What’s Wrong with the Senate Health Care Bill on Abortion: A Response to Professor Jost, dated March 12, 2010, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops respond to an earlier memorandum that I circulated demonstrating that the House and Senate bill are essentially equivalent on pro-life issues. On January 20, 2010, […]

Everything Relates to Everything Else: An Interview with Sara Rosenbaum

Sara Rosenbaum is Chair of the Department of Health Policy and Harold and Jane Hirsh Professor of Health Law and Policy. The O’Neill Institute’s Lester Feder spoke with her about the way forward after Republican Scott Brown’s election to represent Massachusetts in the US Senate. Lester Feder:  What are the options that Congress has right […]

Why Employers are Unlikely to Use the Exchanges to Purchase Insurance for their Employees

Under both the House and Senate bills, employers are permitted to purchase health insurance for their employees through the exchange. The exchange has been seen as having real potential for helping small employers. The CBO estimated that 9 million employees of small employers would get coverage through the exchange under the House bill and five […]

Confiscatory Insurance Regulation, Further Thoughts

Mark’s response to Richard Epstein’s observations on the constitutionality of the Senate bill certainly does the job, but I will add a few notes. First, although Epstein’s article is much more attentive to the actual details of the law than is much of Epstein’s writing on health care topics, he is selectively attentive, as Mark […]

Confiscatory Insurance Regulation: Yet Another Constitutional Attack, Rebutted

The formidable Richard Epstein has launched the latest attack on the constitutionality of health care reform.  He argues that minimum medical loss ratios coupled with tougher insurance standards are “confiscatory” rate regulation that vioate the Takings Clause or substantive due process.   As with other right-wing constitutional attacks, he suggests this conclusion is firmly based in […]

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin